The end of the First World War: the formation of global intergovernmental structures and global political trends

Authors

  • Marina Lebedeva Moscow State Institute of International Relations of MFA of Russia (MGIMO University), 76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.301

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of what political trends, structures and ideas laid down by the results of World War I are reflected in the practice of current world politics. It is shown that at the end of World War I not only the field called “international relations”, with its two classical theories — realism and liberalism—was formed, but also the political organization of the world was significantly changed. Firstly, as a result of the war, the first ever system of international (interstate) relations was formed, Versailles-Washington, which went beyond the limits of the European continent. Secondly, the first universal international organization was created — the League of Nations. All this served as a strong impetus for the implementation of global political ideas and the formation of global governance structures, and later it was developed in the processes of political globalization and the liberal world order, understood as openness, rationality and adherence to common legal norms and standards. At the same time, the article shows that both globalization and the liberal world order are not identical with Westernization or Americanization. Thirdly, as a result of the creation of a socialist state, the Westphalian model of the world was challenged, not only in theoretical terms, but in practical terms. In other words, an attempt was made to build an alternative to the Westphalian model.

Keywords:

World War I, system of international (interstate) relations, Westphalian model of the world, globalization, liberal world order

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Carr E. The Twenty Years’ Crisis. 1919–1939. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 233 p.

Levy J. S., Vasquez J. Chapter 1. Introduction: Historians, Political Scientists and the Causes of the First World War // The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and Decision-Making / ed. by J. S.Levy, J.Vasquez. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. P. 3–29.

Анисимов М.Ю. Кризис Утрехтской системы международных отношений и Елизаветинская Россия // Новая и новейшая история. 2014. № 3. С. 123–140.

Богатуров А.Д. Понятие мировой политики в теоретическом дискурсе // Мировая политика: теория, методология, прикладной анализ / под ред. А.А.Кокошина, А.Д.Богатурова. М.: КомКнига, 2005. С. 178–211.

Pfaltzgraff R.L., Jr. World War I and IR Theory // The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2019. Vol. 43, no. 1. P. 5–18.

Четырнадцать пунктов президента США В. Вильсона об условиях мира. Из его послания Конгрессу от 8 января 1918 г. // Системная история международных отношений в четырех томах. 1918–2000 / под ред. А.Д.Богатурова. М.: НОФМО, 2000. Т. 2: Документы 1910–1940-х годов. С. 27–28.

Куприянов А. Опасный миф Вестфаля // Сайт РСМД. 25.04.2019. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/opasnyy-mif-vestfalya/?sphrase_id=28416659 (дата обращения: 08.05.2019).

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест Коммунистической партии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Собр. соч. 2-е изд. М.: Издательство политической литературы, 1955. Т. 4. С. 419–459. URL: http://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Manifesto/manifesto.html (дата обращения: 08.05.2019).

Троцкий Л. Перманентная революция: сборник. М.: АСТ, 2005. 573 с.

Энгельс Ф. Анти-Дюринг // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. М.; Л.: Соцэкгиз, 1931. Т. 14. 359 с.

Ленин В.И. Государство и революция // Ленин В.И. Полн. собр. соч. 5-е изд. М.: Государственное изд-во политической литературы, 1969. Т. 33. С. 1–120.

Арбатов Г.А. Выступление. Материалы научной дискуссии «Место и роль СССР в мировом цивилизационном процессе» // Вестник Академии наук СССР. 1991. № 3. С. 3–17.

Иноземцев В.Л. Вестернизация как глобализация и «глобализация» как американизация // Вопросы философии. 2004. № 4. C. 58–69. URL: http://ec-dejavu.ru/g/Globalization.html (дата обращения: 08.05.2019).

Гринин Л.Е. Истоки глобализации: мир-системный анализ // Век глобализации. 2011. № 1. С.80–94. URL: https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/files/vg/2011_1/080-094.pdf (дата обращения: 08.05.2019).

Кувалдин В.Б. Глобальный мир: политика, экономика, социальные отношения. М.: Весь мир, 2017. 400 c.

Лебедева М.М. Система политической организации мира: «Идеальный шторм» // Вестник МГИМО — Университета. 2016. № 2. C. 125–133.

Най Дж. Уцелеет ли либеральный миропорядок? // Россия в глобальной политике. 2017. Т. 15. № 2. С. 72–82. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/utceleet-li-liberalnyi-miroporyadok-18651 (дата обращения: 08.05.2019).

Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia / ed. by A.Acharya and B.Buzan. New York: Routledge, 2010. 341 p.

Алексеева Т.А., Лебедева М.М. Что происходит с теорией международных отношений // Полис. Политические исследования. 2016. № 1. С. 29–43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.03.

Кортунов А. Неизбежность странного мира // Россия в глобальной политике. 2016. 16 июля. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Neizbezhnost-strannogo-mira-18288 (дата обращения: 08.05.2019).

Wallerstein I. Globalization or the Age of Transition? A Long-Term View of the Trajectory of the World-System // International Sociology. 2000. Vol. 15, no. 2. P. 251–267.

Ikenberry J. The end of Liberal International order? // Foreign Affairs. 2018. No. 1. P. 7–23

References

Carr, E. (2016), The Twenty Years’ Crisis. 1919–1939, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 233 p.

Levy, J. S. and Vasquez, J. (2014), Chapter 1. Introduction: Historians, Political Scientists and the Causes of the First World War, in The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and DecisionMaking, ed. by Levy, J. S., Vasquez, J., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 3–29.

Anisimov, M.Iu. (2014), The crisis of the Utrecht system of international relations and Elizabethan Russia. Modern history, Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, no. 3, pp. 123–140. (In Russian)

Bogaturov, A.D. (2005), The concept of world politics in theoretical discourse, in Mirovaia politika: teoriia, metodologiia prikladnoi analiz, ed. by Kokoshin, A.A. and Bogaturov, A.D., KomKniga Publ., Moscow, pp. 178–211. (In Russian)

Pfaltzgraff, R.L., Jr. (2019), World War I and IR Theory, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 5–18.

President Wilson’s Fourteen Points (2000), in Sistemnaia istoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v chetyrekh tomakh. 1918–2000, vol. 2, Dokumenty 1910–1940-kh godov, ed. by Bogaturov, A.D., NOFMO Publ., Moscow, pp. 27–28. (In Russian)

Kupriyanov, A. The dangerous myth of Westfalia, RSMD. 25.04.2019, available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/opasnyy-mif-vestfalya/?sphrase_id=28416659 (accessed: 08.05.2019). (In Russian)

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955), The Communist Manifesto, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Sobranie sochinenii, 2nd ed., Politicheskoi literatury Publ., Moscow, vol. 4, pp. 419–459, available at: http://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Manifesto/manifesto.html (accessed: 08.05.2019). (In Russian)

Trotskiy, L. (2005), Permanent revolution: Anthology, AST Publ., Moscow, 573 p. (In Russian)

Engels, F. Anti-Dühring, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Sochineniia, vol. 14, Sotsekgiz Publ., Moscow and Leningrad, 359 p. (In Russian)

Lenin, V.I. (1969), State and revolution, Lenin, V.I., Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 5th ed., vol. 33, Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo politicheskoi literatury Publ., Moscow, pp. 1–120. (In Russian)

Arbatov, G.A. (1991), Address, Vestnik Akademii nauk SSSR, no. 3, pp. 3–17. (In Russian)

Inozemtsev, V.L. (2004), Westernization as globalization and “globalization” as Americanization, Voprosy filosofii, no. 4, pp. 58–69, available at: http://ec-dejavu.ru/g/Globalization.html (accessed: 08.05.2019). (In Russian)

Grinin, L.Ie. (2011), The Sources of Globalization: A World-Systems Analysis, Vek globalizatsii, no. 1, pp. 80–94, available at: https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/files/vg/2011_1/080-094.pdf (accessed: 08.05.2019). (In Russian)

Kuvaldin, V.B. (2017), Global world: politics, economics, social relations, Ves’ mir Publ., Moscow, 400 p. (In Russian)

Lebedeva, M.M. (2016), The system of the political organization of the world: “The perfect storm”, Vestnik MGIMO — Universiteta, no. 2, pp. 125–133. (In Russian)

Nye, J. (2017), Will the liberal world order survive?, Rossiia v global’noi politike, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 72–82, available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/utceleet-li-liberalnyi-miroporyadok-18651 (accessed: 08.05.2019). (In Russian)

Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia (2010), ed. by Acharya, A. and Buzan, B., Routledge, New York, 341 p.

Alekseyeva, T.A., and Lebedeva, M.M. (2016), What happens to the theory of international relations, Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, no. 1, pp. 29–43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.03. (In Russian)

Kortunov, A. (2016), Inevitability of the strange world, Rossiia v global’noi politike, July 16, available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Neizbezhnost-strannogo-mira-18288 (accessed: 08.05.2019). (In Russian)

Wallerstein, I. (2000), Globalization or the Age of Transition? A Long-Term View of the Trajectory of the World-System, International Sociology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 251–267.

Ikenberry, J. (2018), The end of Liberal International order?, Foreign Affairs, no. 1, pp. 7–23.

Published

2019-10-28

How to Cite

Lebedeva, M. (2019). The end of the First World War: the formation of global intergovernmental structures and global political trends. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 12(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.301

Issue

Section

Problems of War and Peace 100 Years Later: The Treaty of Versailles & Modernity