The Belt and Road Initiative and international relations theories: Challenges and a new research agenda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.103Abstract
The majority of existing research on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) focuses primarily on its operation in past years. However, efforts to deepen an understanding of the BRI itself remain at an early stage. Some fundamental questions on its nature, scope, process and implications still remain and require clearer answers or even more debates. Scholars who fail to consider these larger questions risk developing their arguments on premature assumptions on the BRI and consequently overlooking very important elements of it. From the discipline of international relations (IR), this article aims to identify some key questions to the BRI and recommend a new research agenda. It argues that IR scholars face challenges to examine the BRI due to the BRI itself, as a puzzle, and limits of current dominant IR trends. This article suggests that a better understanding of the BRI involves a more open-minded conceptualization of it. The new research agenda on the BRI proposes to focus on five themes and related key questions and hypotheses. In order to tackle the complexity of the BRI, this agenda calls for more creative efforts, including a combination of various theoretical perspectives, and incorporation of more elements of non-western wisdom into analytical frameworks, including China and other countries. Being aware of the debates of incommensurability between paradigms and perspectives, this article suggests a pragmatic approach in acquiring knowledge on the BRI.
Keywords:
Belt and Road Initiative, international relations, research agenda
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Build a Sustainable Belt and Road, Editorial (2019), Nature, no. 569 (5), available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01309-0/ (accessed: 11.03.2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01309-0
Masood, E. (2019), How China Is Redrawing the Map of World Science, Nature, no. 574, is. 7778, available at: https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-019-01124-7/ (accessed: 26.10.2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01124-7
Ascensão, F., Fahrig, L., Clevenger, A., Corlett, R., Jaeger, J., Laurance, W. and Pereira, H. (2018), Environmental Challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nature Sustainability, no. 1 (5), pp. 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3
ESCAP. China’s “One belt, One road” Initiative: An ESCAP Report (2017), Population & Development Review, no. 43 (3), pp. 583–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12089
Tekdal, V. (2018), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: At the Crossroads of Challenges and Ambitions, The Pacific Review, no. 31 (3), pp. 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1391864
Zhai, F. (2018), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Preliminary Quantitative Assessment, Journal of Asian Economics, no. 55, pp. 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.006
Ferdinand, P. (2016), Westward ho — the China Dream and ‘One Belt, One Road’: Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping, International Affairs, no. 92 (4), pp. 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660
Blanchard, F., Colin, F. (2017), The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative, Geopolitics, no. 22 (2), pp. 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503
Clarke, M. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s New Grand Strategy? Asia Policy, no. 24 (1), pp. 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0023
Wang, Y. (2016), Offensive for Defensive: the Belt and Road Initiative and China’s New Grand Strategy, The Pacific Review, no. 29 (3), pp. 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1154690
Andornino, B. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative in China’s Emerging Grand Strategy of Connective Leadership, China & World Economy, no. 25 (5), pp. 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12211
Kamel, S. (2018), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for the Middle East, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, no. 31 (1), pp. 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1480592
Clarke, M. (2016), ‘One Belt, One Road’ and China’s Emerging Afghanistan Dilemma, Australian Journal of International Affairs, no. 70 (5), pp. 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1183585
Schinas, O. and Westarp, A., Graf von (2017), Assessing the Impact of the Maritime Silk Road, Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, no. 2 (3), pp. 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2017.08.002
Lee, P. et al. (2018), Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative with a focus on maritime transport, Maritime Policy & Management, no. 45 (3), pp. 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1400189
Ma, J., et al. (2017), One Belt One Road (OBOR) Initiative in Central Asia: The Study of OBOR on China and Central Asia Agricultural Trade, Transformations in Business & Economics, no. 16 (3), pp. 41–55.
Fardella, E. and Giorgio, P. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative Impact on Europe: An Italian Perspective, China & World Economy, no. 25 (5), pp. 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12217
Vangeli, A. (2017), China’s Engagement with the Sixteen Countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative, China & World Economy, no. 25 (5), pp. 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12216
Rolland, N. (2017), China’s Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative, National Bureau of Asian Research, Project MUSE, available at: muse.jhu.edu/book/52595 (accessed: 26.10.2019).
Kaczmarski, M. (2017), Two Ways of Influence-Building: The Eurasian Economic Union and the One Belt, One Road Initiative, Europe-Asia Studies, no. 69 (7), pp. 1027–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1373270
Mayer, M. (2018), China’s Rise as Eurasian Power: The Revival of the Silk Road and Its Consequences, Rethinking the Silk Road, ed. by Mayer, M., Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5915-5_1
Huang, J. (2016), Silk Road Economic Belt: Can Old BITs Fulfil China’s New Initiative? Journal of World Trade, no. 50 (4), pp. 733–754.
Huang, Y., Thomas, F. and He, X. (2017), The Stakeholder Analysis for SEA of Chinese Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative in Pakistan, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, no. 35 (2), pp. 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1251698
Herrero, G., Xu, J. (2017), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe Expect Trade Gains? China & World Economy, no. 25 (6), pp. 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12222
Zhang, N., et al. (2017), Carbon Footprint of China’s Belt and Road, Science, no. 357 (6356), pp. 1107–1107. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao6621
Tracy, F., et al. (2017), China’s New Eurasian Ambitions: The Environmental Risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Eurasian Geography and Economics, no. 58 (1), pp. 56–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1295876
Kaczmarski, M. (2017), Non-western Visions of Regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union, International Affairs, no. 93 (6), pp. 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix182
Wang, G. (2017), The Belt and Road Initiative in Quest for a Dispute Resolution Mechanism, Asia Pacific Law Review, no. 25 (1), pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2017.1321731
Gabusi, G. (2017), “Crossing the River by Feeling the Gold”: The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Financial Support to the Belt and Road Initiative, China & World Economy, no. 25 (5), pp. 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12212
Sanders, J. (2017), The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Belt and Road Initiative: Complementarities and Contrasts, Chinese Journal of International Law, no. 16 (2), pp. 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmx019
Tsui, Sit, et al. (2017), One Belt, One Road: China’s Strategy for a New Global Financial Order, Monthly Review, no. 68 (8), pp. 36–45. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-068-08-2017-01_4
Zhang, F., et al. (2017), The Effect of RMB Internationalization on Belt and Road Initiative: Evidence from Bilateral Swap Agreements, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, no. 53 (12), pp. 2845–2857. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1382346
Sarker, I., et al. (2018), One Belt One Road Initiative of China: Implication for Future of Global Development, Modern Economy, no. 9 (04), pp. 623–638. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2018.94040
Hu, R., Liu, R., Hu, N. (2017), China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Global Health Perspective, The Lancet Global Health, no. 5 (8), pp. e752-e753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30250-4
Jacob, T. (2017), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Perspectives from India, China & World Economy, no. 25 (5), pp. 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12215
Timofeev, I., Lissovolik, Y. and Filippova, L. (2017), Russia’s Vision of the Belt and Road Initiative: From the Rivalry of the Great Powers to Forging a New Cooperation Model in Eurasia, China & World Economy, no. 25 (5), pp. 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12214
Sidaway, D. and Chih, W. (2017), Chinese Narratives on “One Belt, One Road” (一带一路) in Geopolitical and Imperial Contexts, The Professional Geographer, no. 69 (4), pp. 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1288576
Zeng, J. (2017), Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of “One Belt One Road” and “New Type of Great Power Relations”, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, no. 55 (5), pp. 1162–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12535
Wang, Y. (2018), China’s Dilemma on the Belt and Road Initiative, Gonggong waijiao jikan, no. 02, pp. 50–56+135.
Yu, H. (2017), Motivation behind China’s “One Belt, One Road” Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Journal of Contemporary China, no. 26 (105), pp. 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894
Cheng, K. (2016), Three Questions on China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”, China Economic Review, no. 40, pp. 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.008
Huang, Y. (2016), Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, Framework and Assessment, China Economic Review, no. 40, pp. 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.007
Lingliang, Z. (2016), Conceptual Analysis of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Road towards a Regional Community of Common Destiny, Chinese Journal of International Law, no. 15 (3), pp. 517–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmw021
Rolland, N. (2017), China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or Game-changer? The Washington Quarterly, no. 40 (1), pp. 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2017.1302743
Building the Belt and Road: Concept, Practice and China’s Contribution (2017), The Office of the Leading Group for Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative, May 10, available at: https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/qwfb/12731.htm (accessed: 23.10.2019).
The Belt and Road Initiative Progress, Contributions and Prospects Office of the Leading Group for Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative (2019), The Office of the Leading Group for Promoting the Belt and Road Initiative, April 22, available at: https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/zchj/qwfb/86739.htm (accessed: 23.10.2019).
World Premier of The Belt and Road Initiative: 2018 Report on Five Connectivity Indexes at Taihe Civilizations Forum, September 15, 2018, Institute of Ocean Research, Peking University, available at: https://ocean.pku.edu.cn/info/1165/3077.htm (accessed: 21.09.2019).
Zeng, J. (2016), Constructing a “New Type of Great Power Relations”: The State of Debate in China (1998–2014), British Journal of Politics & International Relations, no. 18 (2), pp. 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148115620991
Zeng, J., Xiao, Y. and Breslin, S. (2015), Securing China’s Core Interests: The State of the Debate in China, International Affairs, no. 91 (2), pp. 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12233
Friedrichs, J. and Kratochwil, F. (2009), On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology, International Organization, no. 63 (4), pp. 701–731. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990142
Bauer, H. and Brighi, E. (2009), Introducing Pragmatism to International Relations, Pragmatism in International Relations, eds Bauer, H. and Brighi, E., Routledge, pp. 17–24. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885093
Frankel Pratt, S. (2016), Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory, International Studies Review, no. 18 (3), pp. 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv003
Guo, H., et al. (2017), DBAR: International Science Program for Sustainable Development of the Belt and Road Region Using Big Earth Data, Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, no. 32 (Z1), pp. 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2017.1405925
García-Herrero, A., Xu, J. (2019), Countries’ Perceptions of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Big Data Analysis, Bruegel Working Papers, Brussels, Febryary 6, available at: https://search.proquest.com/openview/90c63053dee380ee823f6cde71fc6383/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2043318 (accessed: 23.09.2019).
On Translation to English in China Keywords (2018), China Daily, March 1, available at: language.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201803/01/WS5b2cd425a3103349141de4df.html (accessed: 05.08.2019). (In Chinese)
Kaplan, Y. (2017), China’s OBOR as a Geo-functional Institutionalist Project, Baltic Journal of European Studies, no. 7 (1), pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0002
Joshua, J. (2019), The Belt and Road Initiative and International Relations, The Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Economy, ed. by Joshua, J., Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28068-0_7
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B. and Roselle, L. (2015), Strategic Narratives: A Response, Critical Studies on Security, no. 3 (3), pp. 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1103023
Chellaney, B. (2017), China’s Debt-trap Diplomacy, Project Syndicate, available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-one-belt-one-road-loans-debt-by-brahma-chellaney-2017-01?barrier=accesspaylog (accessed: 22.05.2019).
Chellaney, B. (2017), Sri Lanka the Latest Victim of China’s Debt-trap Diplomacy, Asia Times, available at: https://asiatimes.com/2017/12/sri-lanka-latest-victim-chinas-debt-trap-diplomacy/ (accessed: 22.05.2019).
Hodge, A. (2018), China’s Debt-trap Diplomacy Snares Our Asian Neighbours, The Weekend Australian, January 13.
Eszterhai, V. et al. (2019), China’s “Debt Trap Diplomacy”, in Africa: False Accusation or Reality? April 8, available at: http://www.geopolitika.hu/en/2019/04/08/chinas-debt-trap-diplomacy-in-africa-falseaccusation-or-reality/ (accessed: 03.08.2019).
Mearsheimer, J. (2019), Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order, International Security, no. 43 (4), pp. 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
Haass, R. (2019), How a World Order Ends: And What Comes in Its Wake, Foreign Affairs, no. 98 (1), pp. 22–30.
EU Steps Up Its Strategy for Connecting Europe and Asia, Brussels, 19 September 2018, European Commission, available at: https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-5803_en.htm (accessed: 22.05.2019).
Shen, S. and Chan, W. (2018), A Comparative Study of the Belt and Road Initiative and the Marshall plan, Palgrave Communications, no. 4 (1), p. 32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0077-9
Sil, R. and Katzenstein, P. (2010), Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics, Macmillan International Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01359-0_1
Friedrichs, J. and Kratochwil, F. (2009), On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology, International Organization, no. 63 (4), pp. 701–731. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990142
Downloads
Published
2020-04-22
How to Cite
Yuan, H. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative and international relations theories: Challenges and a new research agenda. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 13(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.103
Issue
Section
The Belt and Road Initiative for a Polycentric World
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
