Public diplomacy in Afghanistan, 2002–2018: Impact of the USA on social networks, political system and universities

Authors

  • Natalia Tsvetkova Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Anna Sytnik Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.402

Abstract

The study applies both qualitative methods of analysis to evaluate U.S. government documents and quantitative methods to analyse a considerable amount of data relative to social networks and reveals three areas of U.S. public diplomacy in Afghanistan, notably informational projects and the establishment of local social media, the development of civic society and the americanization of universities. Several findings resulted from the study. Firstly, the United States tries to make an impact on Afghan users in social networks and disseminates its positive image; however, as soon as the government terminates its activity on social media or does not produce some attractive news, the supporters of the Taliban disseminate a strong anti-American stance among the users. Moreover, the majority of Afghan population does not use the Internet, which reduces the ability for Washington to exert influence in remote provinces. The second finding is that the democratization of Afghanistan’s political system and the support of political parties, observers and the civil society are more successful. However, the security problems and the sabotage on the part of the traditional Afghan society limit the opportunities to build a new political landscape in terms of Washington’s view. Finally, the transformation of universities and the americanization of curricula, structures, models of teaching, etc., are also restrained by the resistance on the part of the academic community of Afghanistan.

Keywords:

public diplomacy, United States, Afghanistan, social media

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Remarks by President Trump on the Strategy in Afghanistan and South Asia, August 21, 2017. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-strategy-afghanistan-southasia/ (accessed 20.06.2018).

The Administration’s 2017 Budget Request for Assistance to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Hearing. House Committee on Foreign Affairs. April 27, 2016. Available at: https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/hearing/jointsubcommittee-hearing-presidents-plan-afghanistan-pakistan-objectives-resources/ (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Hellman M. New Media and the War in Afghanistan: The Significance of Blogging for the Swedish Strategic Narrative. New Media & Society, 2015, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6–23.

Shahrani N. The Impact of the 2014 U.S.-NATO Withdrawal on the Internal Politics of Afghanistan. Asian Survey, 2015, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 273–298.

Maley W. Statebuilding in Afghanistan: Challenges and Pathologies. Central Asian Survey, 2013, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 255–270.

Social Media in Afghanistan, 2017. Available at: http://www.altaiconsulting.com (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Comprehensive Annual Report on Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting. U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, 2016. Available at: http://www.state.gov/pdcommission/reports/index.htm (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Performance and Accountability Report, BBG, 2017. Available at: https://www.bbg.gov/wp-content/media/2017/11/BBG_FY_2017_PAR.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Afghan Service: Radio Azadi. Available at: https://pressroom.rferl.org/p/6122.html (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Annual Report, BBG, 2016. Available at: https://2016.bbg.gov (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Global Audience Estimate from the 2015 Performance and Results Report, BBG, 2015. Available at: https://www.bbg.gov/wp-content/media/2015/11/2015-Global-Audience-Overview-Factsheet.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Paywast. Cruchbase. Available at: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/paywast SectionOverview (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Social Media in Afghanistan Takes on Life of its Own. The New York Times, 29.04.2014.

ISIS Online: Countering Terrorist Radicalization and Recruitment on The Internet and Social Media. Hearing. U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. July 6, 2016. Available at: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/Subcommittees/Investigations/Hearings/Isis-Online-Countering-Terrorist-Radicalization-And-Recruitment-On-TheInternet_Social-Media (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Internet World Statistics. Available at: https://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Democracy Assistance, U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2017. Available at: www.gao.gov (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Supporting Elections in Afghanistan, USAID Associate Cooperative Agreement, 2005. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACF485.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Audit of Support to the Electoral Process and Support for Increased Electoral Participation in Afghanistan Programs, USAID, 2011. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACS021.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Afghanistan Election Observation Mission. Final Report, USAID, 2014. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KJ4X.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Monthly Report Advancing Efforts for Reform and Civic Accountability, 2016. Available at: www.usaid.gov (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Afghanistan Electoral Reform and Civic Advocacy Agreement, USAID, 2016. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACT899.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Tsvetkova N. Americanisation, Sovietisation, And Resistance at Kabul University: Limits of The Educational Reforms. History of Education, 2017, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 343–365.

Scott-Smith G. Mapping the Undefinable: Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Exchange Programmes within International Relations Theory. Annals of The Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, no. 616, pp. 173–195.

Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 1998, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 171–200.

Afghanistan’s Higher Education Project, USAID, 2008. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACS021.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Afghanistan Consultation Workshop Report, USAID, 2002. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MT83.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Afghanistan Higher Education Project. Final Evaluation, USAID, 2011. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACS007.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

University Support and Workforce Development Program, 2016. Available at: www.usaid.gov (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Institutional Partnerships Program. Annual Progress Report, 2003. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACG185.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Afghanistan Education Programs: Analysis and Lessons Learned Study, USAID, 2016. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KJ4X.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Mid-Term Evaluation of the American University of Afghanistan, 2016. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00M7QW.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Pre-Certification Assessment of American University of Afghanistan, 2016. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MDG1.pdf (accessed: 20.06.2018).

Published

2018-12-24

How to Cite

Tsvetkova, N., & Sytnik, A. (2018). Public diplomacy in Afghanistan, 2002–2018: Impact of the USA on social networks, political system and universities. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 11(4), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.402

Issue

Section

Central Asia and Afghanistan in World Politics