После революции: от метафоры прогресса к чему?

Аlexander Nikiforov

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.105

Authors

Аlexander Nikiforov Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.105

Abstract

The article is devoted to the scientific issue of revolution in contemporary studies and social science in general. The author examines classic and contemporary theoretical approaches to
the analysis of the revolutionary process and offers the approach for the studying that is appropriate for political science. The proposed research perspective focuses on the analysis of
the revolutionary process through its trajectory of political and social change in a narrow (political mobilization) and large (institutional and societal changes) scales. The author is argued
that the trajectory of the revolutionary process does not always imply its social nature, which is influenced by different factors.

Keywords:

revolution, study of revolution, political revolution, social revolution, event, problematization, revolutionary narrative, political Islam

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Фюре Ф. Постижение Французской революции. СПб.: ИНАПРЕСС, 1998. 224 с.

Эйзенштадт Ш. Революция и преобразование обществ. Сравнительное изучение цивилизаций. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1999. 415 с.

Skocpol T. State and Revolution: Old Regimes and Revolutionary Crises in France, Russia, and China // Theory and Society. 1979. Vol. 7, N 1/2. P. 77–96.

Хантингтон С. Политический порядок в меняющихся обществах. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2004. 480 с.

Ash T.G. We the People: The Revolution of ’89 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin and Prague. London: Granta, 1990. 156 p.

Стародубровская И.В., Мау В.А. Великие революции: от Кромвеля до Путина. Второе исправленное и дополненное издание. М.: ВАГРИУС, 2001. 510 с.

Магун А. Отрицательная революция: к деконструкции политического субъекта. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2008. 416 с.

Голдстоун Д. К теории революции четвертого поколения // Философско-литературный журнал «Логос». 2006. № 5. С. 58–103.

Goldstone J.A., Ulfelder J. How to construct stable democracies // The Washington Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 28, N 1. P. 7–20.

Tilly С. Does Modernization Breed Revolution? // Comparative Politics. 1973. Vol. 5, N 3. P. 425–447. Вестник СПбГУ. Политология. Международные отношения. 2018. Т. 11. Вып. 1 51

Foran J. Taking Power: On the Origin of Third World Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 395 p.

Бартушка В. Советское влияние на смену режима в Чехословакии в 1989 г. // Революции 1989 года в странах Центральной (Восточной) Европы: взгляд через десятилетие. М.: Наука, 2001. С.176–182.

Mann M. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results // States in history / ed. by J.A.Hall. London: Basil Blackwell, 1986. P. 109–136.

Рансьер Ж. На краю политического. М.: Праксис, 2006. 237 с.

Mitchell T. The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics // American Political Science Review. 1991. Vol. 85, N 1. P. 77–96.

Ленин В.И. Марксизм и восстание // Ленин В.И. Полн. собр. соч. 5-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1981. Т.34. С. 242–247.

Ukraine Country Report. URL: http://www.bti-project.org/en/reports/country-reports/detail/itc/ukr/ (дата обращения: 02.11.2017).

Капустин Б. О предмете употребления понятия «революция» // Философско-литературный журнал «Логос». 2006. № 6. С. 3–47.

Mata J.F., Ziaja S. Users’ Guide on Measuring Fragility. Bonn: German Development Institute and the United Nations Development Programme, 2009. 139 p.

Кастель Р. «Проблематизация» как способ прочтения истории // Мишель Фуко и Россия: сб. статей / под ред. О.Хорхордина. СПб.; М.: Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге, Летний сад, 2001. С. 11–45.

Walt S.M. ISIS as revolutionary state // Foreign Affairs. 2015. Vol. 94, N 6. P. 42–51

References

Furet F. Postizhenie Frantsuzskoi revoliutsii [Interpreting the French revolution]. St. Petersburg, INAPRESS, 1998. 224 p. (In Russian)

Eisenstadt S. Revoliutsiia i preobrazovanie obshchestv. Sravnitel’noe izuchenie tsivilizatsii [Revolution and the transformation of societies: A comparative study of civilizations]. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1999. 415 p. (In Russian)

Skocpol T. State and Revolution: Old Regimes and Revolutionary Crises in France, Russia, and China. Theory and Society, 1979, vol. 7, no. 1/2, pp. 77–96.

Huntington S. Politicheskii poriadok v meniaiushchikhsia obshchestvakh [Political order in changing societies]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiia Publ., 2004. 480 p. (In Russian)

Ash T.G. We the People: The Revolution of’89 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin and Prague. London, Granta, 1990. 156 p.

Starodubrovskaia I.V., Mau V.A. Velikie revoliutsii: ot Kromvelia do Putina [The great revolutions: from Cromwell to Putin]. 2nd revised and supplemented ed. Moscow, Vagrius Publ., 2001. 510 p. (In Russian)

Magun A. Otritsatel’naia revoliutsiia: k dekonstruktsii politicheskogo sub’’ekta [Negative revolution: to the deconstruction of the political subject]. St. Petersburg, Publishing house of the European University in St. Petersburg, 2008. 416 p. (In Russian)

Goldstone J. K teorii revoliutsii chetvertogo pokoleniia [Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory]. Philosophical and literary journal Logos, 2006, no. 5, pp. 58–103. (In Russian)

Goldstone J.A., Ulfelder J. How to construct stable democracies. The Washington Quarterly, 2004, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 7–20.

Tilly С. Does Modernization Breed Revolution? Comparative Politics, 1973, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 425–447.

Foran J. Taking Power: On the Origin of Third World Revolutions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005. 395 p.

Bartushka V. Sovetskoe vliianie na smenu rezhima v Chekhoslovakii v 1989 g. [Soviet influence on the regime change in Czechoslovakia in 1989]. Revoliutsii 1989 goda v stranakh Tsentral’noi (Vostochnoi) Evropy: vzgliad cherez desiatiletie [Revolution of 1989 in the countries of Central (Eastern) Europe: a look through the decade]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2001. (In Russian)

Mann M. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results. States in history, ed. by J.A.Hall. London, Basil Blackwell, 1986, pp. 109–136.

Rancière J. Na kraiu politicheskogo [On the edge of the political]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2006. 237 p. (In Russian)

Mitchell T. The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics. American Political Science Review, 1991, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 77–96.

Lenin V.I. Marksizm i vosstanie [Marxism and Insurrection]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], 5th ed. Moscow, Politizdat, 1981, vol. 34, pp. 242–247. (In Russian)

Ukraine Country Report. Available at: http://www.bti-project.org/en/reports/country-reports/detail/itc/ukr/ (accessed: 02.11.2017).

Kapustin B. O predmete upotrebleniia poniatiia “revoliutsiia” [On the subject of the use of the concept of “revolution”]. Philosophical and literary journal Logos, 2006, no. 6, pp. 3–47. (In Russian)

Mata J.F., Ziaja S. Users’ Guide on Measuring Fragility. Bonn, German Development Institute and the United Nations Development Programme, 2009. 139 p.

Kastel R. «Problematizatsiia» kak sposob prochteniia istorii [“Problematization” as a way of reading history]. Mishel’ Fuko i Rossiia: sb. statei [Michel Foucault and Russia: Sat. articles]. Ed. by O.Horkhordin. St. Petersburg, Moscow, Evropeiskii universitet v Sankt-Peterburge, Letnii sad Publ., 2001, pp. 11–45. (In Russian)

Walt S.M. ISIS as revolutionary state. Foreign Affairs, 2015, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 42–51