Evaluation of the sub-regional integration of the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) and its effects on Thailand’s domestic economy

Authors

  • Ngampramuan Soavapa Ramkhamhaeng University, 2086 Ramkhamhaeng Rd, Hua Mak, Bang Kapi District, Bangkok 10240, Bangkok, Thailand; Aoyama Gakuin University, 4 Chome-4-25 Shibuya, Shibuya City, Tokyo 150-8366, Japan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-4359

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.107

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the sub-regional integration dynamics exhibited in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) process and its impact on Thailand’s economic development. Subregionalism assumes that sub-regional integration processes are based on geographic proximity, local business and governmental actors, and a shared historical and cultural awareness. The GMS includes Cambodia, China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam, which have been engaged in this cooperation since 1992. Among these countries in Southeast Asia, Thailand has the largest economy, and it has a strong interest in supporting sub-regional integration with the GMS countries, because it includes Thai national economic development policy and government projects, which are also supported by Thailand’s business sector. Indeed, there are clearly observable economic impacts, since Thailand’s border regions profit from a growing trans-border economy between Thailand and the other GMS countries. This paper will examine how the GMS Strategic Framework (SF) II (2012–2018) relates to Thailand’s development strategies and will analyse the implications with regard to economic corridor and transport development in the context of the 2012–2018 strategy. Such an enquiry is especially relevant considering that Thailand promotes the development of economic corridors and the facilitation of cross-border economic activities to link with neighbouring countries in terms of trade, investment, and tourism. However, by placing these developments in a contemporary historical context, we also have to evaluate Thailand’s early approaches to sub-regional integration processes within the Mekong area.

Keywords:

Asian sub-regionalism, Mekong Sub-region, Thailand economic development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Asia-Europe Meeting Information Board (2015), 12th ASEM Foreign Ministers’ Meeting — Chair’s Statement, November 5–6, available at: https://d333mq0i40sk06.cloudfront.net/documents/2015_-_ASEM_FMM12_-_Chair_Statement_7P3dJOK.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Gamble, A. and Payne, A. (1996), Regionalism and World Order, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 296 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24514-7

Waltz, S. M. (1986), Origins of Alliance, Cornell University Press, New York, 336 p.

Hook, G. and Kearns, I. (1999), Subregionalism and World Order, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 268 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14650-5

Jessop, B. (2001), Poulantzas’s State, Power, Socialism as a Modern Classic, Reading Poulantzas, eds Gallas, A., Bretthauer, L., Kannankulam, J. and Stutzle, I., Merlin, London, pp. 42–55.

Phillip, N. (2003), Reconfiguring Subregionalism: The Political Economy of Hemispheric Regionalism in the Americas, International Affairs, no. 79 (2), pp. 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00311

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2002), REG: Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program — Joint Summit Declaration: 1st GMS Summit Leaders, November, available at: https://www.greatermekong.org/sites/default/files/1st-summit-joint-declaration-greater-mekong-subregion-gms.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Conference on Subregional Economic Cooperation and Asian Development Bank (1994), Economic cooperation in the greater Mekong subregion: Toward implementation: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Subregional Economic Cooperation among Cambodia, People’s Republic of China, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Thailand and Viet Nam, Hanoi, Viet Nam, 20–23 April 1994. Manila, Philippines, Asian Development Bank. 406 p.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2011), The Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program Strategic Framework 2012–2022, Mandaluyong City, Philippines, available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/33422/files/gms-ec-framework-2012-2022.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Verbiest, J.-P. (2007), APCAC Annual Meeting at Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam on ADB in Regional Integration: The Case of the Greater Mekong Subregion, March 23, available at: http://36mfjx1a0yt01ki78v3bb46n15gp.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/070323-ADB-Presentation-GMS-J.P.-Verbiest.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Greater Mekong Subregion Secretariat (GMS) (2017), Mid-Term Review of the GMS Strategies Framework 2012–2022, available at: https://www.greatermekong.org/sites/default/files/STF-21%20-%20Appendix%207%20GMS%20MTR%20%28CNguyen%29.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Greater Mekong Subregion Secretariat (GMS) (2016), Mid-Term Review and Revised Regional Investment Framework Implementation Plan 2020, available at: https://www.greatermekong.org/sites/default/files/gms-rif-ip-2020.pdf (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Snitwongse, K. (1993), Thailand in 1993: Politics of Survival, Asian Survey, no. 34 (2), pp. 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.1994.34.2.00p03622

Funston, J. (1998), Thai Foreign Policy: Seeking Influence, Southeast Asian Affairs, pp. 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812306883-020

Siamwalla, A. (2002), The Evolving of the State, Private, and Local Actors in Rural Asia, Oxford University Press (China), Hong Kong, 190 p.

Battersby, P. (2014), Timetabling Globalization: Technology, Travel and Peripheral Integration, The SAGE Handbook of Globalization, eds Steger, M. B., Battersby P. and Siracusa, J. M., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 347–362. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473906020.n21

Battersby, P. (1998), Border Politics and the Broader Politics of Thailand’s International Relations in the 1990s: From Communism to Capitalism, Pacific Affairs, no. 71 (4), pp. 473–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/2761080

Pednekar, S. (1995), NGOs and Natural Resources Management in Mainland Southeast Asia, TDRI Quarterly Review, no. 10 (3), pp. 21–27.

Chumchaivet, B. (2015), Indo-China: Golden Opportunity for AEC, Thairath Newspaper, May 11, available at: https://www.thairath.co.th/content/498040 (accessed: 20.11.2019). (In Thai)

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Thailand [Greater Mekong Sub-Region] (2003), available at: www.mfa.go.th (accessed: 01.11. 2003).

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board, Office of the Prime Minister (2016), The Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan (201–2021), available at: http://www.nesdb.go.th/nesdb_en/ewt_w3c/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=4345 (accessed: 20.11.2019).

Downloads

Published

2020-04-22

How to Cite

Soavapa, N. (2020). Evaluation of the sub-regional integration of the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) and its effects on Thailand’s domestic economy. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 13(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.107

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Countries and regions of the polycentric world

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.