Post-Brexit France: French Renaissance or loss of geopolitical influence?

Authors

  • Igor Ivannikov St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Igor Chernov St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.102

Abstract

Brexit has become a catalyst for major political change in the modern world. This article analyzes the consequences Brexit had on France’s foreign policy position and its status as a “great power”. In chess, the “English Gambit” is known, in which a player sacrifices his piece to gain a strategic advantage. Will France be able to play its English Gambit after the British exit from the EU? In the modern world, the concept of a “great power” primarily presupposes the ability of the country to exert a serious influence on the most important global decisions. For a long time, France has not been able to act alone in the international arena and relies on its influence in the EU to achieve its goals. Therefore, it is obvious that Britain’s withdrawal from the forming the “European pole” of world politics was a serious blow both to the EU and to France. Of course, in the analysis of international relations “after something” does not always mean “as a result of something”, but in 2020–2021, a significant number of facts can be noted that testify to the negative impact of Brexit on the role of France in Europe and the world in general. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Britain’s exit from the EU on France’s political role in the European Union and, in general, on France’s global importance as a great power. The authors use comparative analysis, structural-functional method, etc. The empirical basis of the study was made up of media materials, statements and speeches of contemporary politicians, and documents of foreign policy institutions of France and the EU.

Keywords:

France, foreign policy, great power, Brexit, European Union

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Hobolt, S. (2016), The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 23, iss. 9, p. 1259–1277.

Ansorg, N. and Haastrup, T. (2016), Brexit Beyond the UK’s Borders: What It Means for Africa. GIGA Focus Africa, no. 03. URL: https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/giga-focus/brexit-beyond-theuk-s-borders-what-it-means-for-africa (дата обращения: 10.04.2021).

Evans, G. and Menon, A. (2017), Brexit and British Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Freedman, L. (2020), Britain Adrift: The United Kingdom’s Search for a Post-Brexit Role, Foreign Affairs, May/June, p. 118–130.

Худолей, К. К. и Еремина, Н. В. (2017), Брекзит: новый «старый» выбор Великобритании, Современная Европа, № 3(75), с. 28–36.

Кавешников, Н. Ю. (2016), Некоторые последствия Brexit для развития ЕС. Вестник МГИМО, т. 6, № 51, с. 24–30.

Védrine, H. (2020), Géopolitique, la place de la France dans le monde, Conflits. Revue de Géopolitique, 17 août. URL: https://www.revueconflits.com/geopolitique-place-de-la-france-hubert-vedrine/ (дата обращения 10.04.2021).

Рубинский, Ю. И. (2018), Франция на новых рубежах: в 3 т. Т. 3, М.: Ин-т Европы РАН.

Жуков, А. Д. и Шумилов, М. М. (2020), Внешнеполитическая стратегия Пятой республики: робкий поворот к Большой Евразии, Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика, № 1, с. 84–93.

Чернов, И. В. (2018), Постконструктивизм или теория лингвистического реализма, Вестник СПбГУ. Международные отношения, т. 11, вып. 1, с. 86–104.

Бжезинский, З. (1998), Великая шахматная доска. Господство Америки и его геостратегические императивы, М.: Международные отношения.

Nye, J. Jr. (2011), The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.

Бэттлер, А. (2002), Контуры мира в первой половине XXI века и чуть далее. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, № 1, с. 73–80.

Валлерстайн, И. (2001), Анализ мировых систем и ситуация в современном мире, пер. с англ. Курдюкин, П. М., общ. ред. Кагарлицкий, Б. Ю., СПб.: Университетская книга.

Богатуров, А. (2006), Лидерство и децентрализация в мировой системе, Международные процессы, № 3 (12), с. 5–15.

Гаджиев, К. С. (2007), К Полицентрическому миропорядку, Полис. Политические исследования, № 4, с. 8–23.

Комлева, Н. А. (2010), Геополитический статус государства: сущность и типология. Геополитика и безопасность, № 1(9), с. 23–28.

Темников, Д. М. (2007), Опыт теоретического осмысления мирового регулирования, Полис. Политические исследования, № 6, с. 133–145.

Уткин, А. И. (2000), Мировой порядок XXI века, М.: Эксмо.

Лукашук, И. И. (2004), Современное право международных договоров: в 2 т. Т. 1, М.: Волтерс Клувер.

Шаклеина, Т. А. (2011), Великие державы и региональные подсистемы. Международные процессы, т. 2, № 26, с. 29–39.

Сурков, В. Ю. (2006), Суверенитет — это политический синоним конкурентоспособности. Стенограмма выступления заместителя Руководителя Администрации Президента — помощника Президента РФ Владислава Суркова перед слушателями Центра партийной учебы и подготовки кадров ВПП «Единая Россия», 7 февраля. URL: http://www.politnauka.org/library/public/surkov.php (дата обращения: 12.09.2021).

«Концерт великих держав» XXI века — многосторонний диалог великих держав в пост- трансатлантическую эпоху (2015), изд. на русском языке под ред. А. И. Никитина, М.: МГИМО- Университет.

Discours d’Emmanuel Macron à l’Institut de France sur l’ambition pour la langue française et le plurilinguisme, mars 20, 2018. URL: https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2018/03/20/discours-demmanuel-macron-a-linstitut-de-france-sur-lambition-pour-la-langue-francaise-et-le-plurilinguisme (дата обращения: 10.04.2021).

Rapport d’information de M. Louis Duvernois et Mme Claudine Lepage, fait au nom de la commission de la culture, de l’éducation et de la communication no. 436 (2016–2017), février 22, 2017. URL: https://www.senat.fr/notice-rapport/2016/r16-436-notice.html (дата обращения 10.04.2021).

Mushikiwabo, L. (2020), Après le Brexit, la primauté de l’anglais peut-elle perdurer alors qu’il ne figure plus parmi les langues officielles de l’Union? Le Monde, 6 février URL: https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2020/02/06/apres-le-brexit-la-primaute-de-l-anglais (дата обращения 10.04.2021)

Après le Brexit, mais pourquoi l’anglais reste-t-il la langue unique de l’Union Européenne? Février 23, 2020. URL: https://www.initiative-communiste.fr/articles/europe-capital/apres-le-brexit-mais-pourquoilanglais-reste-t-il-la-langue-unique-de-lunion-europeenne/ (дата обращения: 08.04.2021).

Rosenau, J. N. (1997), Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge University Press.

Bonse, E. (2017), L’Europe après le Brexit: positions et perspectives allemandes, Notes de l’Ifri. Notes du Cerfa, no. 135. URL: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ndc_135_bonse_europe_apres_brexit_fr.pdf (дата обращения: 08.04.2021).

Рубинский, Ю. И. и Федоров, С. М. (2021), «Кризис подводных лодок» и его возможные последствия, Аналитические записки Института Европы РАН, вып. 4(28), с. 5–10. http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics429202105101


References

Hobolt, S. (2016), The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 23, iss. 9, pp. 1259–1277.

Ansorg, N. and Haastrup, T. (2016), Brexit Beyond the UK’s Borders: What It Means for Africa, GIGA Focus Africa, no. 03. Available at: https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/giga-focus/brexit-beyondthe-uk-s-borders-what-it-means-for-africa (accessed: 10.04.2021).

Evans, G. and Menon, A. (2017), Brexit and British Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Freedman, L. (2020), Britain Adrift: The United Kingdom’s Search for a Post-Brexit Role, Foreign Affairs, May/June, pp. 118–130.

Khudoley, K. K. and Eremina, N. V. (2017), Brexit: the new “old” choice of Great Britain, Sovremennaia Evropa, no. 3(75), pp. 28–36. (In Russian)

Kaveshnikov, N. Yu. (2016), Some Consequences of Brexit for EU Development, MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 51, pp. 24–30. (In Russian)

Védrine. H. (2020), Géopolitique, la place de la France dans le monde, Conflits. Revue de Géopolitique, August 17. Available at: https://www.revueconflits.com/geopolitique-place-de-la-france-hubert-vedrine/ (accessed: 10.04.2021)

Rubinsky, Yu. I. (2018), France on new frontiers, in 3 vols, vol. 3, Moscow: Institute of Europe RAS. (In Russian)

Zhukov, A. D. and Shumilov, M. M. (2020), Foreign policy strategy of the Fifth Republic: a timid turn to Greater Eurasia, Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics, no. 1, pp. 84–93. (In Russian)

Chernov, I. V. (2018), Postconstructivism or the theory of linguistic realism, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 86–104. (In Russian)

Brzezinski, Z. (1998), The Great Chessboard. American dominance and its geostrategic imperatives, Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia Publ. (In Russian)

Nye, J. Jr. (2011), The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.

Battler, A. (2002), The contours of the world in the first half of the 21st century and a little further, World economy and international relations, no. 1, pp. 73–80. (In Russian)

Wallerstein, I. (2001), Analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world, trans. from English by Kudyukin, P. M., ed. by Kagarlitsky, B. Yu., St Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga Publ. (In Russian)

Bogaturov, A. (2006), Leadership and decentralization in the world system. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, no. 3(12), pp. 5–156. (In Russian)

Gadzhiev, K. S. (2007), Towards a Polycentric World Order. Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 8–23.

Komleva, N. A. (2010), Geopolitical status of the state: essence and typology, Geopolitics and Security, no. 1(9), pp. 23–28. (In Russian)

Temnikov, D. M. (2007), Experience of theoretical comprehension of world regulation, Polis. Political Studies, no. 6, pp. 133–145. (In Russian)

Utkin, A. I. (2000), World order of the 21st century, Moscow: Eksmo Publ. (In Russian)

Lukashuk, I. I. (2004), Modern law of international treaties, in 2 vols., vol. 1, Moscow: Volters Kluver Publ. (In Russian)

Shakleina, T. A. (2011), Great powers and regional subsystems, Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, no. 2(26), pp. 29–39. (In Russian)

Surkov, V. Yu. Sovereignty is a political synonym for competitiveness. Transcript of the speech of the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration — Aide to the President of the Russian Federation Vladislav Surkov before the audience of the Center for Party Education and Training of the WFP “United Russia” on February 7, 2006. Available at: http://www.politnauka.org/library/public/surkov.php (accessed: 12.09.2021). (In Russian)

“Concert of the Great Powers” of the 21st century — a multilateral dialogue of the great powers in the post-transatlantic era (2015), International scientific project with the participation of scientists from Russia, Germany, France, Great Britain, Switzerland, Austria, USA, India, China, ed. by Nikitin, A. I., Moscow: MGIMO University. (In Russian)

Discours d’Emmanuel Macron à l’Institut de France sur l’ambition pour la langue française et le plurilinguisme, mars 20, 2018. Available at: https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2018/03/20/discoursdemmanuel- macron-a-linstitut-de-france-sur-lambition-pour-la-langue-francaise-et-le-plurilinguisme (accessed: 10.04.2021).

Rapport d’information de M. Louis Duvernois et Mme Claudine Lepage, fait au nom de la commission de la culture, de l’éducation et de la communication no. 436 (2016–2017), février 22, 2017. Available at: https://www.senat.fr/notice-rapport/2016/r16-436-notice.html (accessed: 10.04.2021).

Mushikiwabo, L. (2020), Après le Brexit, la primauté de l’anglais peut-elle perdurer alors qu’il ne figure plus parmi les langues officielles de l’Union? Le Monde, 6 février. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2020/02/06/apres-le-brexit-la-primaute-de-l-anglais (accessed: 10.04.2021).

Après le Brexit, mais pourquoi l’anglais reste-t-il la langue unique de l’Union Européenne? 23 février, 2020. Available at: https://www.initiative-communiste.fr/articles/europe-capital/apres-le-brexit-mais-pourquoi-langlais-reste-t-il-la-langue-unique-de-lunion-europeenne/ (accessed: 08.04.2021).

Rosenau, J. N. (1997), Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World, Cambridge University Press.

Bonse, E. (2017), L’Europe après le Brexit: positions et perspectives allemandes, Notes de l’Ifri. Notes du Cerfa, no. 135. Available at: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ndc_135_bonse_europe_apres_brexit_fr.pdf (accessed: 08.04.2021).

Rubinsky, Yu. I. and Fedorov, S. M. (2021), “The submarine crisis” and its possible consequences, Analytical notes of the Institute of Europe RAS, iss. 4(28), pp. 5–10. http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics429202105101 (In Russian)

Published

2022-03-18

How to Cite

Ivannikov, I., & Chernov, I. (2022). Post-Brexit France: French Renaissance or loss of geopolitical influence?. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 15(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.102

Issue

Section

CURRENT ISSUES OF FRANCE’S FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC POLICIES