Modelling negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and absolute gains as factors of international solidarity

Авторы

  • Dmitry Lanko St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.302

Аннотация

The article revisits the negotiations on NORDEK, a Nordic Economic Area, held by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden in 1968–1970. Finland, which initially took active part in the negotiations, later reversed its position under pressure from the Soviet Union as well as for other reasons. Four remaining Nordic countries refused to pursue a Nordic Economic Area without Finland for multiple reasons, of which one was solidarity with Finland. This article presents multiple game models, of which some reflect the actual outcome of the NORDEK negotiations, i. e., their failure, while others reflect hypothetical outcomes of the negotiations, such as emergence of a NORDEK of four without Finland. Those models allow concluding on the main factors causing Nordic solidarity, for which the NORDEK negotiations were a testing ground, and which had been the defining feature of regional politics in the European North during fifty years following the failure of the negotiations. First, domestic uncertainty about the issue debated by multiple nations contributes to greater solidarity among those nations. Second, majority’s focus on their absolute gains during international negotiations contributes to greater solidarity among negotiating nations. Third, relative equality among negotiating nations does not have any influence on solidarity among them. The latter conclusion supports the theoretical assumption that that organic solidarity (solidarity among different) is as possible as is mechanical solidarity (solidarity of similar).

Ключевые слова:

NORDEK, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, solidarity, uncertainty, relative gains, economic power

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

Polanyi, K. (2001), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Books.

Sauvy, A. (1952), Trois mondes, une planète, L’Observateur, no. 118, p. 14.

Iida, K. (1988), Third World Solidarity: The Group of 77 in the UN General Assembly, International Organization, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 375–395.

Bellamy, A. J. (2003), Humanitarian Responsibilities and Interventionist Claims in International Society, Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 321–340.

Nye, J. S. (1973), UNCTAD: Poor Nations’ Pressure Group, in: Cox, R. W., and Jacobson, H. K. (eds), The Anatomy of Influence: Decision-Making in International Organization, New Heaven: Yale University Press, pp. 334–370.

Bakke, E., and Sitter, N. (2020), The EU’s Enfants Terribles: Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe since 2010, Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720001292 (accessed: 10.02.2022).

Durkheim, E. (1997), The Division of Labor in Society, trans. by Halls, W. D., with an introduction by Coser, L. A., New York: Free Press.

Amstrup, N., and Sørensen, C. L. (1975), Denmark — Bridge between the Nordic Countries and the European Communities?, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 10, no. 1/2, pp. 21–32.

Nielsson, G. P. (1971), The Nordic and the Continental European Dimensions in Scandinavian Integration: NORDEK as a Case Study, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 6, no. 3/4, pp. 173–181.

Wiklund, C., and Sundelius, B. (1979), Nordic Cooperation in the Seventies: Trends and Patterns, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–120.

Broad, M. (2016), Keeping your Friends Close: British Foreign Policy and the Nordic Economic Community, 1968–1972, Contemporary European History, vol. 25, no.3, pp. 459–480.

Kansikas, S. (2009), NORDEK Is an Anti-Soviet group: the Soviet Attitude to Finnish Participation in the NORDEK Plan, in: Hecker-Stampehl, J. (ed.), Between Nordic Ideology, Economic Interests and Political Reality, Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, pp. 109–122.

Sonne, L. (2007), NORDEK: A Plan for Increased Nordic Economic Co-operation and Integration 1968–1970, Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.

Moravcsik, A. (1998), The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Ueland, G. K. (1975), The NORDEK Debate: An analysis of the attitudes of Nordic elites toward the relationship between NORDEK and the EC, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 10, no. 1/2, p. 1–19.

Archer, C. (1976), Britain and Scandinavia: Their Relations with EFTA, 1960–1968, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–23.

Jónsson, G. (2009), On the Sidelines: Iceland and the Nordek Negotiations, 1968–1970, in: Hecker- Stampehl, J. (ed.), Between Nordic Ideology, Economic Interests and Political Reality, Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, pp. 159–167.

Haas, E. B. (2004), The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, 3rd ed., Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Sundelius, B. (2018), Managing Transnationalism in Northern Europe, New York: Routledge.

Stråth, B. (1980), The Illusory Nordic Alternative to Europe, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–114.

Mead, W. R. (1984), Norden: Destiny and Fortune, Daedalus, vol. 113, no, 1, pp. 1–27.

Börzel, T. A., and Risse, T. (2020), Identity Politics, Core State Powers and Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 21–40.

Elder, N., Thomas, A. H., and Arter, D. (1982), The Consensual Democracies? Government and Politics of the Scandinavian States, Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Melitz, M. J., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2008), Market Size, Trade and Productivity, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 295–316.

Walt, S. M. (1985), Alliance Formation and the Balance of Power, International Security, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3–43.

Powell, R. (1991), Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory, American Political Science Review, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1303–1320.

World Bank. Data: Gross Domestic Product by Country. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=FI-SE-DK-NO-IS (accessed: 10.02.2022).

Tiilikainen, T. (1998), A Nordic Identity in European Security: Does It Exist?, Irish Studies in International Affairs, vol. 9, pp. 51–54.

Mäentakanen, E. (1978), Western and Eastern Europe in Finnish Trade Policy, 1957–1974: Towards a Comprehensive Solution?, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–41.

Suomi, J. (1996), Taistelu puoluettomuudesta: Urho Kekkonen 1968–1972, Helsinki: Otava.

Strang, J. E., and Olesen, T. B. (2015), European Challenge to Nordic Institutional Cooperation: Past, Present and Future, in: Strang, J. E. (ed.), Nordic Cooperation: A European Region in Transition, New York: Routledge, pp. 27–47.

Milas, R. (1984), Les relations entre la Communaute europeene et les pays Nordiques, Revue de Marché Commun, vol. 282, pp. 534–543.

Dolan, P. (1959), The Nordic Council, Western Political Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 511–526.

World Bank. Data: Gross Domestic Product Per Capita by Country. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=FI-SE-DK-NO-IS (accessed: 10.02.2022).

Wicklund, C. (1970), The Zig-Zag Course of the NORDEK Negotiations, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 5, no A5, pp. 307–336.

Forster, K. (1974), NORDEK and Finnish-Russian Relations (1967–1970), Scandinavian Studies, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 229–241.

Lanko, D. A. (2021), Finlandization, Neutrality or Kekkoslovakia? Paasikivi — Kekkonen’s Line in Finnish Discourses 30 years after the End of the Cold War, International Analytics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 139–153.

Aalto, P., Espiritu, A. A., Kilpeläinen, S., and Lanko, D. A. (2017), The Coordination of Policy Priorities among Regional Institutions from the Baltic Sea to the Arctic: The Institutions Coordination Dilemma, Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 135–160.

Huldt, B. (1979), The Nordic Countries and the New International Economic Order: Consensus and Disagreement within the Nordic Group, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 14, no. 2/3, pp. 149–157.

Skully, M. T. (1976), Finland and the EEC: A Historical Economic Outline of Their Trade Relations, Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 220–230.

Singleton, F. (1974), Finland, COMECON, and the EEC, The World Today, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 64–72.

Hansson, P., and Stefansdottir, A. B. (2021), Nordic Solidarity and COVID-19, Small States and Territories, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–44.

Загрузки

Опубликован

01.10.2022

Как цитировать

Lanko, D. (2022). Modelling negotiations on the Nordic Economic Area: Uncertainty and absolute gains as factors of international solidarity. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения, 15(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.302

Выпуск

Раздел

Малые державы в международной политике