Elements of Сritical Theory in BRICS: An evaluation of BRICS’ critique of global affairs

Авторы

  • Valdir Bezerra University of São Paulo (Brazil), Largo Sao Francisco, 95 — Centro, Sao Paulo — SP, 01005-010, Brasil; St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Elen Bueno University of São Paulo (Brazil), Largo Sao Francisco, 95 — Centro, Sao Paulo — SP, 01005-010, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.307

Аннотация

In the 1980s, Robert W. Cox (considered the “father of Critical Theory” in IR) envisioned that a counter-hegemonic movement could arise in the future from the multilateral alliance of less privileged States, which could resist the dominance of the central powers of the system. Almost three decades later, the 2008 Financial Crisis, the decline of the US hegemony (propelled by its unilateralist actions) and the rise of emerging economies all over the world resulted in a scenario of transformation and redistribution of power in international relations. In that context, a reformist movement driven by developing countries (some of them located geographically distant from one another), especially by the BRICS nations, voiced new demands for democratization of global governance at the international level, contesting the US and Western hegemony in world affairs and the underrepresentation of less-privileged States in important multilateral organizations. From the analysis of the conceptual framing of Critical Theory to the context behind the inception of BRICS and its positions in international relations, this article aims to explore the elements that could possibly connect the group to the interpretations undertaken by Critical Theorists, showing that the group does hold certain positions that can allow such an association.

Ключевые слова:

BRICS, multilateralism, Critical Theory, Western Hegemony, emerging economies

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

Woods, N., Betts, A. Prantl, J., and Devi Sridhar, D. (2013). Transforming Global Governance for the 21st Century. New York: UNDP Human Development Report Office, occasional paper.

Cooper, R. (1996), The Post-Modern State and the World Order, London: Demos.

Wolf, M. (2019), Today and Tomorrow: To meet future challenges, the IMF must have strong backing from its members, IMF: Finance & Development. Available at: https://www.imf.org/extemal/pubs/ft/fandd/2019/06/pdf/the-future-of-the-imf-wolf.pdf (accessed: 23.08.2021).

Amorim, C. (2010), Discurso do Ministro Celso Amorim por ocasião da abertura da “Global South- South Development Expo 2010”. Available at: http://www.itamaraty.gov.hr/pt-BR/discursos-artigos-e-entrevistas-categoria/ministro-das-relacoes-exteriores-discursos/9900-discurso-do-ministro-celso-amorimpor-ocasiao-da-abertura-da-global-south-south-development-expo-2010-genebra-22-11-2010 (accessed: 23.08.2021).

Gutierrez, G. (1999), The Task and Content of Liberation Theology, in: Rowland, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Liberation Theology, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–38.

UNCTAD (2014), UNCTAD at 50, a Short History, Geneve: United Nations.

Bedjaoui, M. (1979), Towards a New International Economic Order, Paris: UNESCO; New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

Waltz, K. (2000), Structural Realism after the Cold War, International Security, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–41.

Rodrik, D. (2006), Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of The World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 44, pp. 973–987.

Hoffmann, S. (1977), An American Social Science: International Relations, Daedalus, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 41–60.

Waever, O. (1998), The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 687–727.

Cox, R. (1983), Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An essay on method, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 12 (2), pp. 162–175.

Zaslavskaya, N. (2017), Theories of International Relations. In: Tsvetkova, N. (ed.), Russia and the World: Understanding International Relations. United States of America: Lexington Books, pp. 3-24.

Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 126–155.

Linklater, A. (1996), The Achievements of Critical Theory, in: Smith, S., Booth, K., and Zalewski, M. (eds), International Theory: Positivism & Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–298.

Wallerstein, I. (1984). The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements and the Civilizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wohlforth, W. C. (1999), The Stability of a Unipolar World, International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 5–41.

Barnett, M., and Durvall, R. (2005), Power in International Politics, International Organization, vol. 59, pp. 39–75.

Wolfrum, R. (2008), Legitimacy of International Law from a Legal Perspective: Some Introductory Considerations, in: Legitimacy in International Law, Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–24.

Newman, E., Thakur, R., and Tirman, J. (eds) (2006), Multilateralism Under Challenge? Power, International Order, and Structural Change, Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.

Ruggie, J. G. (1992), Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 561–598.

Keohane, R. (2006), The Contingent Legitimacy of Multilateralism, in: Newman, E., Thakur, R., and Tirman, J. (eds) (2006), Multilateralism Under Challenge? Power, International Order, and Structural Change, Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, pp. 56–76.

Georgiev, D. (1993), Politics or rule of law: deconstruction and legitimacy in international law, European Journal of International Law, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–14.

Allison, G. (2020), The New Spheres of lnfluence: Sharing the Globe with Other Great Powers, Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-02-10/new-spheresinfluence (accessed: 12.03.2021).

Acharya, A. (2017), After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 271–285.

Lima, M. R. (2005), A Politica Externa Brasileira e os Desafios da Cooperacao Sul-Sul, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 24–59.

Gilley, B., and O’Neil, A. (2014), China’s Rise Through the Prism of Middle Powers, in: Middle Powers and the Rise of China, Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–22.

Lagutina, M. L. (2019), BRICS in A World of Regions, Third World Thematics, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 442– 458.

Jordaan, E. (2003), The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing Between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers, Politikon, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 166–171.

Macfarlane, N. (2006), The ‘R’ in BRICS: Is Russia an Emerging Power?, International Affairs, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 41–57.

Acharya, A. (2017), Global Governance in a Multiplex World, European University Institute: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/46849/RSCAS_2017_29.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 23.08.2021).

Mazarr, M. J., Blake, J. S., Casey, A., McDonald, T., Pezard, S., and Spirtas, M. (2018), Understanding the Emerging Era of International Competition: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, RAND Corporation: Research Report, RR-2726-AF, pp. 1–46. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research/reports/RR2726.html (accessed: 18.06.2021).

Nóbrega, K. (2016), BRICS: de Fortaleza a Goa, Cadernos de Política Exterior / Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 29–56.

Ying, H. (2013), BRICS: a new cooperation model in the horizon, in: Kornegay, F. A., and Bohler- Muller, N. (eds), Laying the BRICS of a New Global Order: From Yekaterinburg 2009 to eThekwini 2013, Pretória: Africa Institute of South Africa, pp. 51–64.

Richmond, O., and Tellidis, I. (2013), The BRICS and international peacebuilding and state building, NOREF Report. Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre.

Abdenur, A. E., and Folly, M. (2015), The New Development Bank and the Institutionalization of the BRICS, R/evolutions: Global Trends & Regional Issues, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 66–92.

Fourth BRICS Summit: Delhi Declaration (2012). Available at: http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/120329-delhi-declaration.html (accessed: 09.05.2021).

Papa, M. (2014), BRICS as a global legal actor: from regulatory innovation to BRICS Law?, Rivista di diritto pubblico italiano, comparato, europeo, no. 20. Available at: https://www.federalismi.it/nv14/articolodocumento.cfm?Artid=27757 (accessed: 09.05.2021).

Sergunin, A. (2019), Theorizing BRICS: Critical Perspectives, in: International Legal Aspects of BRICS, Belo Horizonte: Editora D’Placido, pp. 95–124.

Joint Statement of the BRIC Countries’ Leaders (2009). Available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/209 (accessed: 12.06.2021).

eThekwini Declaration. South Africa (2013). Available at: http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/130327-statement.html (accessed: 13.04.2021).

Armijo, L. E., and Roberts, C. (2014), The Emerging Powers and Global Governance: Why the BRICS Matter, in: Looney, R. E. (ed.), Handbook of emerging economies, London: Routledge, pp. 503–524.

Alexandroff, A., and Cooper, A. F. (eds) (2010), Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance, Brookings Institution Press.

Tkachenko, S. (2017), International Political Economy, in: Tsvetkova, N. (ed.), Russia and the World: Understanding International Relations, Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 79–102.

Griffith-Jones, S. (2014), A BRICS Development Bank: a dream coming true? Discussion papers, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, no. 215.

nd BRIC Summit of Heads of State and Government: Joint Statement (2010). Available at: http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/100415-leaders.html (accessed: 29.04.2021).

Batista Jr, P. (2016), BRICS — O Novo Banco de Desenvolvimento, Estudos Avançados, vol. 30, no. 88, pp. 179–184.

Treaty for the Establishment of a BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement (2014). Available at: http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/140715-treaty.html (accessed: 16.03.2021).

South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) (2015), The BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement and its Position in the Emerging Global Financial Architecture. Available at: https://saiia.org.za/research/the-brics-contingent-reserve-arrangement-and-its-position-in-the-emerging-global-financialarchitecture/ (accessed: 16.03.2021).

IMF [International Monetary Fund] (2011), Quota and Voting Shares Before and After Implementation of Reforms Agreed in 2008 and 2010 (In percentage shares of total IMF quota). Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2011/pdfs/quota_tbl.pdf (accessed: 16.03.2021).

Latino, A. (2017), The New Development Bank: Another BRICS in the wall?, in: Accountability, transparency and democracy in the functioning of Bretton Woods institutions, London: Springer International Publishing, pp. 47–69.

Wanglai, Gao (2018), BRICS Cybersecurity Cooperation: Achievements and Deepening Paths, China International Studies, vol. 68, no.20, pp. 124–139.

Загрузки

Опубликован

01.10.2022

Как цитировать

Bezerra, V., & Bueno, E. (2022). Elements of Сritical Theory in BRICS: An evaluation of BRICS’ critique of global affairs. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения, 15(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.307

Выпуск

Раздел

Актуальные проблемы международных исследований