Цифровизация политики vs политика цифровизации

Alexander E. Konkov

doi:10.21638/spbu06.2020.104

Authors

Alexander E. Konkov Moscow State University, 1, Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-9962

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.104

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of the digitalization concept when potentially applied to different spheres of social development and, first of all, to the political sphere in terms of digital economy. The usage of digital technologies in politics is analyzed through the prism of two discourses: digital politics as the extension of digital technologies in political relations and political digitalization based upon policy towards digital technologies in the economic and social sphere. Within the first discourse mechanisms are identified for articulating political interests through social networks (contraposition of twitter-diplomacy and twitter-revolution), e-petitions and on-line voting. Within the discourse of political digitalization, the composition of policy for digital economy development in the Russian Federation in terms of one of the key national priorities for 2018–2024 is analyzed, which is increasing the introduction of digital technologies in the economy and the social sphere. Also, it deals with the regulating activity of the government as a whole for such a policy, which mostly includes efforts to design and compose a national model for managing processes within the emerging digital context. Both discourses demonstrate the trend for a deeper synthesis of technological and social development processes, transforming into interconnected vessels with lesser dependency on any intermediary activity of traditional institutions. The growing influence of digital frameworks in world politics in general encourages the government to mobilize different available instruments for mitigating competition risks within the non-likely controllable sphere of new social relations.

Keywords:

digitalization, digital politics, digital diplomacy, social networks, national projects and programs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Höchtl J., Parycek P., Schöllhammer R. Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era // Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 2016. Vol. 26, no. 1. P. 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187

Халин В. Г., Чернова Г. В. Цифровизация и ее влияние на российскую экономику и общество: преимущества, вызовы, угрозы и риски // Управленческое консультирование. 2018. № 10. С. 46–63. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-46-63

Юдина Т. Н. Цифровизация как тенденция современного развития экономики Российской Федерации: pro et contra // Государственное и муниципальное управление (Ученые записки СКАГС). 2017. № 3. С. 139–143.

Косоруков А. А. Публичная сфера и цифровое управление современным государством. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2019. 320 с.

Чернышов А. Г. Цифровизация и технологизация общественной жизни как социально-политическая проблема: сохранение идентичности и роль государства в условиях развития глобальных сетей // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2017. № 40. С. 319–328. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/40/30

Hanschitz G. Digitalization of Politics and Elections // Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense / Carayannis E., Campbell D., Efthymiopoulos M. (eds). Springer, Cham, 2017. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_3-1

Kaufmann M., Jeandesboz J. Politics and ‘the digital’: From singularity to specificity // European Journal of Social Theory. 2017. Vol. 20, no. 3. P. 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016677976

Hacker K., van Dijk J., eds. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2000. 240 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218891

Negroponte N. Being Digital. New York: Knopf, 1995. 256 p.

Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016. 184 p.

Мор Т., Кампанелла Т., Бэкон Ф. Утопия. Город Солнца. Новая Атлантида. СПб: Азбука, 2017. 320 с.

Raval S. Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin’s Blockchain Technology. Sebastopol: O’Reilly, 2016. 118 p.

Tapscott D., Tapscott A. Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business and the World. London: Portfolio Penguin, 2016. 432 p.

Сморгунов Л. В. Блокчейн как институт процедурной справедливости // Полис. Политические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.05.08

Володенков С. В. Digital-технологии в системе традиционных институтов власти: политический потенциал и современные вызовы // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета (Электронный журнал). 2018. № 2. C. 39–48.

Цветкова Н. А., Ярыгин Г. О. Политизация «цифровой дипломатии»: публичная дипломатия Германии, Ирана, США и России в социальных сетях // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Сер. 6: Философия. Культурология. Политология. Право. Международные отношения. 2013. № 1. С. 119–124.

Токарев А. А. Дискурс украинских элит в отношении территории и населения Донбасса (2009–2018): исследование национального сегмента Facebook: семантика, частотность, эмоциональность, регионализация. М.: МГИМО-Университет, 2018. 116 с.

Коньков А. Е. Сублимация креативного протеста как модель развития мегаполиса // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 21: Управление (государство и общество). 2013. № 1. С. 88–103.

Безруков А. Спасти и сохранить // Россия в глобальной политике. 2017. № 1. С. 58–71.

References

Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., Schöllhammer, R. (2016), Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187

Halin, V. G., Chernova, G. V. (2018), Digitalization and Its Impact on the Russian Economy and Society: Advantages, Challenges, Threats and Risks, Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie, no. 10, pp. 46–63. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-46-63

Yudina, T. N. (2017), Digitization as modern trend of Russian Federation economy: pro et contra, Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie (Uchenye zapiski SKAGS), no. 3, pp. 139–143. (In Russian)

Kosorukov, A. A. (2019), Public Sphere and Digital Public Administration, MAKS Press Publ., Moscow, 320 p.(In Russian)

Chernyshov, A. G. (2017), The digitalization and technologization of social life as a sociopolitical problem: the preservation of the identity and role of the state in the development of global networks, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, ser. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia, no. 40, pp. 319–328. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/40/30

Hanschitz, G. (2017), Digitalization of Politics and Elections, in Carayannis, E., Campbell, D., Efthymiopoulos, M. (eds.), Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense, Springer, Cham, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_3-1

Kaufmann, M., Jeandesboz, J. (2017), Politics and ‘the digital’: From singularity to specificity, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016677976

Hacker, K., van Dijk, J., eds. (2000), Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications Ltd., London, 240 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218891

Negroponte, N. (1995), Being Digital, Knopf, New York, 256 p.

Schwab, K. (2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum, Geneva, 184 p.

More, T., Campanella, T., Bacon, F. (2017), Utopia. The City of the Sun. New Atlantis, Azbuka Publ., St. Petersburg, 320 p. (In Russian)

Raval, S. (2016), Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin’s Blockchain Technology, O’Reilly, Sebastopol, 118 p.

Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A. (2016), Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business and the World, Portfolio Penguin, London, 432 p.

Smorgunov, L. V. (2018), Blockchain as an Institution for Procedure Justice, Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, no. 5, pp. 88–99. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.05.08

Volodenkov, S. V. (2018), Digital-technologies in the system of traditional institutions of power: political potential and contemporary challenges, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (Elektronnyi zhurnal), no. 2, pp. 39–48. (In Russian)

Tsvetkova, N. A., Yarygin, G. O. (2013), Politization of Digital Diplomacy: Public Deplomacy of Germany, Iran USA and Russia in Social Networks, Vestnik Sankt-Peterbugskogo universiteta, ser. 6: Filosofiia. Kul’turologiia. Politologiia. Pravo. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, no. 1, pp. 119–124. (In Russian)

Tokarev, A. A. (2018), Discourse of the Ukrainian Elites towards territories and people of Donbass (2009–2018): Study of the National Segment of Facebook: Semantics, Frequency, Emotionality, Regionalization, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., Moscow, 166 p. (In Russian)

Kon’kov, A. E. (2013), Creative Protest Sublimation as a Model for Megapolis Deveploment, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, ser. 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo), no. 1, pp. 88–103. (In Russian)

Bezrukov, A. (2017), Secure and Save, Rossiia v global’noi politike, no. 1, pp. 58–71. (In Russian)