Digitalization and disinformation: Current governance practices of the European Union

Authors

  • Yury Kolotaev St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2023.406

Abstract

The article focuses on the contemporary problems of the digital space. It considers the threat of disinformation as a systemic phenomenon and a characteristic of “information disorder” and the post-truth era. The study reflects on the main theoretical ideas about the relations between agents of informational influence, involving various stakeholders. It also assesses potential and existing measures to counter disinformation. The experience of the European Union reflects in this context a new, supranational approach to regulation of the digital sphere. This article aims to comprehensively reflect the evolution and the current state of the European Union’s activities in the field of countering disinformation and assess the strengths and weaknesses of its policy. The article considers such important changes in the activities of the European Union as the adoption of the new Digital Services Act, the application of media blocking practices, the revision of previous documents, as well as the transition from a self-regulatory practice to the practice of co-regulation. Strategies, action plans, and resolutions, as well as voluntary codes of practice, provide the basis for the analysis. They reflect the strategic vision, measures, and results of the work of various EU institutions. The study showed that currently the EU has reached a high level of interaction with digital platforms in the fight against disinformation, while the nature of those interactions has gradually changed. Despite the central role of platforms in the EU’s policy, it combines new practices of co-regulation with the development of a particular strategic narrative and cooperation with civil society. At the same time, the current policy reveals a number of negative trends, including the politicization of the problem in the context of geopolitical contradictions, the stigmatization of certain information influence sources, as well as a lack of attention to “non-political” disinformation. Additionally, there are problems in EU policy related to the inconsistency of particular acts, the lack of transparency of numerous measures, and the difficulty of monitoring and evaluating certain actions.

Keywords:

European Union, disinformation, Digital Services Act, post-truth, digitalization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic, The Lancet, vol. 10225, no, 395, p. 676.

Венидиктов, С. В. (2022). Post-truth как угроза медиапотребления в эпоху пандемии, Знак: проблемное поле медиаобразования, № 2 (44), с. 15–22.

Чугров, С. В. (2017), Post-truth: трансформация политической реальности или саморазрушение либеральной демократии?, Полис. Политические исследования. № 2, с. 42–59.

Block, D. (2019), Post-Truth and Political Discourse, Springer International Publishing.

Dalkir, K. (2020), Navigating Fake News, Alternative Facts, and Misinformation in a Post-Truth World, ed. by Katz, R., IGI Global.

Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017), Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking, Council of Europe, 2017.

Сутырин, В. В. (2021), Трансформация публичной дипломатии ЕС: от содержательного кризиса к повестке внешней угрозы, Современная Европа, № 6, c. 17–29.

European Commission (2023), Shaping Europe’s digital future — Tackling online disinformation. URL: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-disinformation (дата обращения: 07.05.2023).

Lasswell, H. D. (1948), The structure and function of communication in society, in: Bryson, В. L. (ed.), The communication of idea, Harper and Row, pp. 37–51.

Braddock, R. (1958), An Extension of the “Lasswell Formula”, Journal of Communication, vol. 8. no. 2, pp. 88–93.

Arendt, H. and Kohn, J. (2006), Between Past and Future (Annotated ed.), Penguin Classics.

Foucault, M. (2017), Subjectivity and Truth: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1980–1981, ed. by Ewald, F., Fontana, A. and Gros, F., Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Lasswell, H. D. (1938), Propaganda technique in the World War, New York: Peter Smith.

Ellul, J. (1973), Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes, trans. by Kellen, K. and Lerner, J., New York: Vintage Books.

Alexander, J. and Smith, J. (2011), Disinformation: A Taxonomy, IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 58–63.

Муценек, В. Е. (2018), Дезинформация как инцидент информационной безопасности. Известия Иркутского государственного университета. Серия: Политология. Религиоведение, № 24, с. 24–32.

Gerrits, A. W. M. (2018), Disinformation in International Relations: How Important Is It?, Security and Human Rights, vol. 29, no. 1–4, pp. 3–23.

Валитова, А. Т. (2022), Фейковые новости как политико-дискурсивный феномен современной эпохи, Вопросы Политологии, № 12 (3), с. 684–691.

Corner, J. (2017), Fake news, post-truth and media–political change, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1100–1107.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. and Cook, J. (2017), Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 353–369.

Kalpokas, I. (2019), A Political Theory of Post-Truth, Springer International Publishing.

Попова, О. В. (2018), «Политика постправды» и популизм, СПб.: Скифия-принт.

Boler, M. and Davis, E. (2018), The affective politics of the “post-truth” era: Feeling rules and networked subjectivity, Emotion, Space and Society, vol. 27, pp. 75–85.

Durnová, A. (2019), Unpacking emotional contexts of post-truth, Critical Policy Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 447–450.

Pothos, E. M., Lewandowsky, S., Basieva, I., Barque-Duran, A., Tapper, K. and Khrennikov, A. (2021), Information overload for (bounded) rational agents, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 288 (1944), pp. 2020–2957.

Jamieson, K. H. and Cappella, J. N. (2008), Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment, 1st ed., New York: Oxford University Press.

Gaultney, I., Sherron, T. and Boden, C. (2022), Political polarization, misinformation, and media literacy, Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–81.

Pérez-Escolar, M. and Noguera-Vivo, J. M. (eds) (2022), Hate Speech and Polarization in Participatory Society, New York: Taylor & Francis.

De Cock Buning, M. (2018), A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation, Publications Office of the European Union.

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W. and Ling, R. (2018), Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions, Digital Journalism, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–153.

Ильченко, С. Н. (2021), Фейк-контроль, или Новости, которым не надо верить: как нас дурачат СМИ, Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс.

Красовская, Н. Р. (2020), Фейковые новости и дипфейки как психотехнологии современной информационной войны, Гуманитарные проблемы военного дела, № 2 (23), с. 191–194.

Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechtsdurchsetzung in sozialen Netzwerken (Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz — NetzDG) vom 1. September 2017. URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/netzdg/BJNR335210017.html (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Loi no 2018-1202 du 22 décembre 2018 relative à la lutte contre la manipulation de l’information (1). URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000037847559/ (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Parliament (2015), Resolution of 15 January 2015 on the situation in Ukraine (2014/2965(RSP). URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0011_EN.html (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Parliament (2016), Resolution of 23 November 2016 on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties (2016/2030(INI)). URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0441_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Parliament (2015), Resolution of 12 March 2015 on the Annual Report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament (2014/2219(INI)). URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0075_EN.html (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Remarks by F. Mogherini on EU strategic communication to counteract anti-EU propaganda by third parties, EEAS Website. URL: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/15765_en (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Questions and Answers about the East StratCom Task Force, EEAS Website. URL: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/questions-and-answers-about-east-stratcom-task-force_en (accessed: 18.01.2023).

Базаркина, Д. Ю. (2021), Эволюция подхода Европейского союза к борьбе с дезинформацией, Власть, № 6, с. 130–138.

European Commission (2018), Communication Tackling Online Disinformation: A European Approach COM/2018/236 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0236 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2018), Joint Communication Action Plan Against Disinformation Join/2018/36 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=JOIN:2018:036:FIN (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Code of Practice on Disinformation (2018), Shaping Europe’s digital future. URL: https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/2018-code-practice-disinformation (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Court of Auditors (2021), Special Report 09/2021: Disinformation affecting the EU: tackled but not tamed. URL: https://www.eca.europa.eu/lists/ecadocuments/sr21_09/sr_disinformation_en.pdf (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Kuczerawy, A. (2019), Fighting Online Disinformation: Did the EU Code of Practice Forget about Freedom of Expression?, in: Disinformation and Digital Media as a Challenge for Democracy (European Integration and Democracy Series, vol. 6), Intersentia, pp. 291–308.

Monti, M. (2020), The EU Code of Practice on Disinformation and the Risk of the Privatisation of Censorship, in: Democracy and Fake News, London: Routledge, pp. 214–225.

Pitruzzella, G. and Pollicino, O. (2020), Disinformation and Hate Speech: A European Constitutional Perspective, EGEA Spa — Bocconi University Press.

Social Observatory for Disinformation and Social Media Analysis, SOMA Project. URL: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/825469 (дата обращения: 18.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Joint Communication Tackling Covid-19 Disinformation — Getting the Facts Right Join/2020/8 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020JC0008 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

EDMO at a Glance, EDMO. URL: https://edmo.eu/edmo-at-a-glance/ (дата обращения: 22.12.2022).

Disinformation: online platforms continue the Code of Practice revision in light of the war in Ukraine and report on first 2022 actions to fight COVID-19 disinformation, European Commission Press Release (2022). URL: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/disinformation-online-platforms-continuecode-practice-revision-light-war-ukraine-and-report-first (дата обращения: 02.02.2023).

Dealing with propaganda, misinformation and fake news — Democratic Schools for All, Council of Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/campaign-free-to-speak-safe-to-learn/dealing-with-propaganda-misinformation-and-fake-news (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).

PACE. URL: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=25406 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).

Sanchez, L. (2021). Report — Bolstering the democratic resilience of the alliance against disinformation and propaganda, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. URL: https://www.nato-pa.int/document/2021-bolstering-democratic-resilienceof-alliance-against-disinformation-and-propaganda (дата обращения: 11.12.2022).

В Москве 16 мая состоялась встреча лидеров государств — членов ОДКБ, посвященная 30-летию подписания Договора о коллективной безопасности и 20-летию создания ОДКБ (2020), ОДКБ. URL: https://odkb-csto.org/news/news_odkb/v-moskve-16-maya-proydet-vstrecha-glav-gosudarstv-chlenov-odkb-posvyashchennaya-30-letiyu-podpisaniya/#loaded (дата обращения: 05.03.2023).

Moynihan, H. (2021), Deplatforming Trump puts big tech under fresh scrutiny, Chatham House* — International Affairs Think Tank. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/01/deplatforming-trumpputs-big-tech-under-fresh-scrutiny (дата обращения: 05.03.2023).

Jhaver, S., Boylston, C., Yang, D. and Bruckman, A. (2021), Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on Twitter, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 381:1–381:30.

European Commission (2020), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council On a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC COM/2020/825 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A825%3AFIN (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance) PE/30/2022/REV/1 — OJ L 277. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=cele x%3A32022R2065 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (Text with EEA relevance) PE/17/2022/REV/1 OJ L 265. URL: https://eurlex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R1925 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) COM/2020/842 final. URL: https://eurlex. europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A842%3AFIN (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

DSA: Commission welcomes political agreement, European Commission — Press corner. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_2545 (дата обращения: 02.02.2023).

European Commission (2020), Joint Communication The EU’s Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade Join/2020/18 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52020JC0018

European Commission (2020), Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027 Resetting education and training for the digital age COM/2020/624 final. URL: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digitaleducation/action-plan (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Communication On the EU Security Union Strategy COM/2020/605 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0605 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Communication Shaping Europe’s Digital Future COM/2020/67 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0067 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Ukraine: Sanctions on Kremlin-backed outlets Russia Today and Sputnik (2022), European Commission — Press corner. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_1490 (дата обращения: 31.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Communication On the European Democracy Action Plan COM/2020/790 Final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0 790 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Russian media “censorship” overrules Swedish & Danish constitution (2022), EUobserver. URL: https://euobserver.com/opinion/156235 (дата обращения: 31.01.2023).

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 July 2022. RT France v Council of the European Union. Case T-125/22. — Document 62022TJ0125. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62022TJ0125#t-ECR_62022TJ0125_EN_01-E0001 (дата обращения: 17.01.2023).

Strengthened Code of practice on disinformation: Commission and signatories call for broader participation (2021), Shaping Europe’s digital future. URL: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/strengthened-code-practice-disinformation-commission-and-signatories-call-broader-participation (дата обращения: 19.05.2023).

Position of the EU DisinfoLab on the 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation, EU DisinfoLab. URL: https://www.disinfo.eu/advocacy/eu-disinfolabs-position-on-the-2022-code-of-practice-on-disinformation/ (дата обращения: 02.02.2023).

Statement by President von der Leyen on further measures to respond to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022), European Commission — Press corner. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_1441 (дата обращения: 31.01.2023).

EU Code of Conduct against online hate speech, European Commission — Press corner. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7109 (дата обращения: 03.02.2023).

* Признана на территории РФ экстремистской организацией


References

Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic, The Lancet, vol. 10225, no. 395, p. 676.

Venidiktov, S. V. (2022). Post-truth as a threat to media consumption in the pandemic era, Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniia, no. 2 (44), pp. 15–22. (In Russian)

Chugrov, S. V. (2017). Post-Truth: Transformation of Political Reality or Self-Destruction of Liberal Democracy?, Polis. Political Research, no. 2, pp. 42–59. (In Russian)

Block, D. (2019), Post-Truth and Political Discourse, Springer International Publishing.

Dalkir, K. (2020), Navigating Fake News, Alternative Facts, and Misinformation in a Post-Truth World, ed. by Katz, R., IGI Global.

Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017), Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking, Council of Europe, 2017.

Sutyrin, V. V. (2021) EU Public Diplomacy Transformation: From the Crisis of Narrative towards External Threat, Sovremennaia Evropa, no. 6, pp. 17–29. (In Russian)

European Commission (2023), Shaping Europe’s digital future — Tackling online disinformation. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-disinformation (accessed: 07.05.2023).

Lasswell, H. D. (1948), The structure and function of communication in society, in: Bryson, В. L. (ed.), The communication of idea, Harper and Row, pp. 37–51.

Braddock, R. (1958), An Extension of the “Lasswell Formula”, Journal of Communication, vol. 8. no. 2, pp. 88–93.

Arendt, H. and Kohn, J. (2006), Between Past and Future (Annotated ed.), Penguin Classics.

Foucault, M. (2017), Subjectivity and Truth: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1980–1981, ed. by Ewald, F., Fontana, A. and Gros, F., Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Lasswell, H. D. (1938), Propaganda technique in the World War, New York: Peter Smith.

Ellul, J. (1973), Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes, trans. by Kellen, K. and Lerner, J., New York: Vintage Books.

Alexander, J. and Smith, J. (2011), Disinformation: A Taxonomy, IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 58–63.

Mutsenek, V. E. (2018), Disinformation as an Information Security Incident, The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, no. 24, pp. 24–32. (In Russian)

Gerrits, A. W. M. (2018), Disinformation in International Relations: How Important Is It?, Security and Human Rights, vol. 29, no. 1–4, pp. 3–23.

Valitova, A. T. (2022). Fake news as a political and discursive phenomenon of the modern era, Voprosy politologii, no. 12 (3), pp. 684–691. (In Russian)

Corner, J. (2017), Fake news, post-truth and media–political change, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1100–1107.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. and Cook, J. (2017), Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 353–369.

Kalpokas, I. (2019), A Political Theory of Post-Truth, Springer International Publishing.

Popova, O. V. (ed.). (2018), “Post-truth politics” and populism, St Petersburg: Skifiia-print Publ. (In Russian)

Boler, M. and Davis, E. (2018), The affective politics of the “post-truth” era: Feeling rules and networked subjectivity, Emotion, Space and Society, vol. 27, pp. 75–85.

Durnová, A. (2019). Unpacking emotional contexts of post-truth, Critical Policy Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 447–450.

Pothos, E. M., Lewandowsky, S., Basieva, I., Barque-Duran, A., Tapper, K. and Khrennikov, A. (2021), Information overload for (bounded) rational agents, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 288 (1944), pp. 2020–2957.

Jamieson, K. H. and Cappella, J. N. (2008), Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment, 1st ed., New York: Oxford University Press.

Gaultney, I., Sherron, T. and Boden, C. (2022), Political polarization, misinformation, and media literacy, Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–81.

Pérez-Escolar, M. and Noguera-Vivo, J. M. (eds) (2022), Hate Speech and Polarization in Participatory Society, New York: Taylor & Francis.

De Cock Buning, M. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation, Publications Office of the European Union.

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W. and Ling, R. (2018), Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions, Digital Journalism, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–153.

Ilchenko, S. N. (2021), Fake control, or News that should not be trusted: How the media fool us, Rostovon-Don: Feniks Publ. (In Russian)

Krasovskaya, N. R (2020), Fake news and deepfakes as psychotechnologies of modern information war, Gumanitarnye problemy voennogo dela, no. 2 (23), pp. 191–194. (In Russian)

Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechtsdurchsetzung in sozialen Netzwerken (Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz — NetzDG) vom 1. September 2017. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/netzdg/BJNR335210017.html (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Loi no 2018-1202 du 22 décembre 2018 relative à la lutte contre la manipulation de l’information (1). Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000037847559/ (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Parliament (2015), Resolution of 15 January 2015 on the situation in Ukraine (2014/2965(RSP). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0011_EN.html (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Parliament (2016), Resolution of 23 November 2016 on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties (2016/2030(INI)). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0441_EN.pdf (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Parliament (2015), Resolution of 12 March 2015 on the Annual Report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament (2014/2219(INI)). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0075_EN.html (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Remarks by F. Mogherini on EU strategic communication to counteract anti-EU propaganda by third parties, EEAS Website. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/15765_en (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Questions and Answers about the East StratCom Task Force, EEAS Website. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/questions-and-answers-about-east-stratcom-task-force_en (accessed: 18.01.2023).

Bazarkina, D. Y. (2021). Evolution of the European Union’s Approach to Countering Disinformation,Vlast’, no. 6, pp. 130–138. (In Russian)

European Commission (2018), Communication Tackling Online Disinformation: A European Approach COM/2018/236 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0236 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2018), Joint Communication Action Plan Against Disinformation Join/2018/36 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=JOIN:2018:036:FIN (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Code of Practice on Disinformation (2018), Shaping Europe’s digital future. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/2018-code-practice-disinformation (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Court of Auditors (2021), Special Report 09/2021: Disinformation affecting the EU: tackled but not tamed. Available at: https://www.eca.europa.eu/lists/ecadocuments/sr21_09/sr_disinformation_en.pdf (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Kuczerawy, A. (2019), Fighting Online Disinformation: Did the EU Code of Practice Forget about Freedom of Expression?, in: Disinformation and Digital Media as a Challenge for Democracy (European Integration and Democracy Series, vol. 6), Intersentia, pp. 291–308.

Monti, M. (2020), The EU Code of Practice on Disinformation and the Risk of the Privatisation of Censorship, in: Democracy and Fake News, London: Routledge, pp. 214–225.

Pitruzzella, G. and Pollicino, O. (2020), Disinformation and Hate Speech: A European Constitutional Perspective, EGEA Spa — Bocconi University Press.

Social Observatory for Disinformation and Social Media Analysis, SOMA Project. Available at: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/825469 (accessed: 18.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Joint Communication Tackling Covid-19 Disinformation — Getting the Facts Right Join/2020/8 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020JC0008 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

EDMO at a Glance, EDMO. Available at: https://edmo.eu/edmo-at-a-glance/ (accessed: 22.12.2022).

Disinformation: online platforms continue the Code of Practice revision in light of the war in Ukraine and report on first 2022 actions to fight COVID-19 disinformation, European Commission Press Release (2022). Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/disinformation-online-platforms-continue-code-practice-revision-light-war-ukraine-and-report-first (accessed: 02.02.2023).

Dealing with propaganda, misinformation and fake news — Democratic Schools for All, Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/campaign-free-to-speak-safe-to-learn/dealing-withpropaganda-misinformation-and-fake-news (accessed: 09.12.2022).

PACE website. Available at: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTMLEN.asp?fileid=25406 (accessed: 09.12.2022).

Sanchez, L. (2021). Report — Bolstering the democratic resilience of the alliance against disinformation and propaganda, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. Available at: https://www.nato-pa.int/document/2021-bolstering-democratic-resilienceof-alliance-against-disinformation-and-propaganda (accessed: 11.12.2022).

On May 16, Moscow hosted a meeting of the leaders of CSTO member states, dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the signing of the Collective Security Treaty and the 20th anniversary of the CSTO (2022), CSTO. Available at: https://odkb-csto.org/news/news_odkb/v-moskve-16-maya-proydet-vstrechaglav-gosudarstv-chlenov-odkb-posvyashchennaya-30-letiyu-podpisaniya/loaded (accessed: 05.03.2023). (In Russian)

Moynihan, H. (2021), Deplatforming Trump puts big tech under fresh scrutiny, Chatham House* — International Affairs Think Tank. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/01/deplatformingtrump-puts-big-tech-under-fresh-scrutiny (accessed: 05.03.2023).

Jhaver, S., Boylston, C., Yang, D. and Bruckman, A. (2021), Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on Twitter, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 381:1–381:30.

European Commission (2020), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council On a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC COM/2020/825 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A825%3AFIN (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance) PE/30/2022/REV/1 — OJ L 277. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32022R2065 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (Text with EEA relevance) PE/17/2022/REV/1 OJ L 265. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R1925 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) COM/2020/842 final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A842%3AFIN (accessed: 17.01.2023).

DSA: Commission welcomes political agreement, European Commission — Press corner. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_2545 (accessed: 02.02.2023).

European Commission (2020), Joint Communication The EU’s Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade Join/2020/18 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52020JC0018

European Commission (2020), Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027 Resetting education and training for the digital age COM/2020/624 final. Available at: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Communication On the EU Security Union Strategy COM/2020/605 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0605 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Communication Shaping Europe’s Digital Future COM/2020/67 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0067 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Ukraine: Sanctions on Kremlin-backed outlets Russia Today and Sputnik (2022), European Commission — Press corner. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_1490 (accessed: 31.01.2023).

European Commission (2020), Communication On the European Democracy Action Plan COM/2020/790 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0790 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Russian media “censorship” overrules Swedish & Danish constitution (2022), EUobserver. Available at: https://euobserver.com/opinion/156235 (accessed: 31.01.2023).

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 July 2022. RT France v Council of the European Union. Case T-125/22. — Document 62022TJ0125. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62022TJ0125#t-ECR_62022TJ0125_EN_01-E0001 (accessed: 17.01.2023).

Strengthened Code of practice on disinformation: Commission and signatories call for broader participation (2021), Shaping Europe’s digital future. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/strengthened-code-practice-disinformation-commission-and-signatories-call-broader-participation (accessed: 19.05.2023).

Position of the EU DisinfoLab on the 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation, EU DisinfoLab. Available at: https://www.disinfo.eu/advocacy/eu-disinfolabs-position-on-the-2022-code-of-practice-ondisinformation/ (accessed: 02.02.2023).

Statement by President von der Leyen on further measures to respond to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022), European Commission — Press corner. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_1441 (accessed: 31.01.2023).

EU Code of Conduct against online hate speech, European Commission — Press corner. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7109 (accessed: 03.02.2023).

* Is recognized in Russian Federation as an extremist organization.

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Kolotaev, Y. (2024). Digitalization and disinformation: Current governance practices of the European Union. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 16(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2023.406

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE DIGITAL AGE